Case StudySeptember 10th, 2025
Bradken R9800 Undercarriage Solution
Solution
Bradken Undercarriage Solution
Situation
At a coal mine in Queensland, operators faced a critical decision regarding the long-term reliability and cost-effectiveness of their hydraulic excavator undercarriages. With two Liebherr R9800 machines in operation, the mine installed undercarriages from Bradken and a competitor within months of each other. Their goal: to track performance side-by-side under identical conditions and determine the best path forward for future undercarriage investments.
Solution
Bradken, leveraging over 40 years of undercarriage design and manufacturing expertise, supplied its advanced crawler shoes and components for one of the R9800 machines. These components were built on a legacy of innovation and OEM collaboration, including more than a decade as the preferred supplier of crawler shoes and drive tumblers for Liebherr’s R996B and R9800 excavators. Bradken’s solution incorporated metallurgical enhancements, rigorous design processes, and the highest standards of manufacturing quality.
Results
The mine’s ongoing comparison has revealed a significant performance gap: Bradken’s undercarriage is projected to last over 50% longer than the competitor’s. This extended wear life translates into fewer change-outs, reduced maintenance costs, and increased machine availability—directly impacting operational efficiency and bottom-line profitability. This data highlights Bradken's demonstrated reliability and proven value to support customers around the world.
Please note that any overall wear life projections calculated from the measurements presented in this report are subject to the assumption that wear rates will remain constant. This is not always true of induction hardened wear faces, especially when spalling and plastic deformation become prevalent. It should also be noted that changes in the propel ratio can have a large impact on any projection of serviceable machine hours.
Predicted end of life wear rate comparison Competitor (16,952hours) vs Bradken (26,381 hours)